The decision by the Republican National Committee (RNC) to raffle an AR-15 at their national convention shortly after the unsettling event of a near assassination attempt on Donald Trump hovers between the absurd and the ominous. This incident not only sharpens the irony but also casts a harsh light on the unsettling juxtaposition of promoting weapons in an already volatile political climate.

Imagine the scene: a convention hall, buzzing with the fervor of political endorsements and speeches, where just days earlier, the atmosphere was thick with the anxiety of a potential tragedy. In this very milieu, where security and political tensions run high, the idea to raffle a weapon capable of mass destruction seems not just imprudent, but grotesquely ironic. It reflects a startling dissonance within the political dialogue, where the right to bear arms is championed at the expense of addressing the palpable risks those same arms often present.

This irony is deepened by the broader context in which these events unfold. On one hand, there's a visible and vocal advocacy for gun rights, underscored by such raffles that seem to celebrate gun ownership as a fundamental American liberty. On the other, there's the undeniable reality of gun violence, which includes politically motivated assaults that have shaken the nation at its core.

The narrative around gun raffles, like that hosted by the Hart County Republican Party, doesn't exist in a vacuum. These events are often publicized as community gatherings or patriotic acts, yet they starkly contrast with the somber news of gun-related incidents that concurrently populate media outlets. Richard Garland, a professor engaged in anti-violence efforts, suggests that promoting weapons in such a manner sends a "wrong message" to society, particularly to the youth who are meant to be the beneficiaries of such fundraising efforts (PublicSource).

Legal justifications aside, the ethical considerations are immense. Advocates for gun control argue that while gun raffles may not be illegal, they are undoubtedly insensitive and potentially harmful, particularly when they occur in close proximity to incidents of violence involving the very figures associated with these events. The RNC's choice to proceed with such a raffle, irrespective of the recent scare involving Trump, underscores a persistent disregard for the broader implications of gun proliferation.

Critics might argue that the timing and context of such a raffle demonstrate a profound disconnect, or worse, a defiant indifference to the growing concerns about safety and the responsible portrayal of gun ownership. The decision to highlight a weapon as a prize shortly after a high-profile security threat not only challenges the boundaries of appropriate conduct but also seems to flout the very dangers that the political and public figures face due to the prevalent gun culture.

As we reflect on these juxtapositions, it becomes clear that the issue is not just about legal rights or fundraising tactics, but about the values and messages we endorse as a society. Are we promoting a culture of vigilance and responsibility, or are we endorsing a narrative that trivializes the potential consequences of widespread weapon access? This incident at the RNC convention serves as a stark reminder of the need for a more thoughtful and cautious approach to how weapons are integrated into public and political spheres. 

AND for ALL critical thinking Americans it is now time to organize, mobilize, register and express your views for common sense gun regulations once and for all at the Ballot Box!  Apathy is Not an Option!!

Please visit our Women’s Voices Home page and start exploring our various shop categories and printed apparel design options which you might want to wear to help support issues important to you and communicate visually to others.